DAVIS v. COLVIN

Filing 15

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ETC. AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS ACTION CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 04/21/2017. 04/21/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(nds)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHARRI DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-4535 O R D E R AND NOW, this 21st day of April, 2017, after reviewing Plaintiff’s Request for Review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (ECF No. 9), the Commissioner's response (ECF No. 10), the Plaintiff’s reply (ECF No. 12), and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski (ECF No. 13), there being no objections, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and 2. Plaintiff’s Request for Review is GRANTED in part ADOPTED; and DENIED in part. The Request for Review is GRANTED to the extent that it seeks a reversal of the Commissioner’s decision denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The Request for Review is DENIED to the extent it seeks a determination by this Court that Plaintiff is entitled to social security benefits; 3. The Commissioner’s decision denying Plaintiff’s claim for benefits is REVERSED; 4. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security in accordance with the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation; and 5. The Clerk of Court shall remove this case from suspense and mark the case as CLOSED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Eduardo C. Robreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?