WHITE v. SUNOCO INC.

Filing 27

ORDER THAT DEFT'S RENEWED MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY LITIGATION IS DENIED. (DOC. NO. 19). SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 5/24/16. 5/24/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DONALD WHITE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SUNOCO INC., Defendant. : : : : : : : : : Civ. No. 15-4595 ORDER AND NOW, this 24th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant Sunoco’s Renewed Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation (Doc. No. 19), Plaintiff’s Response (Doc. No. 20), Defendant’s Reply (Doc. No. 23), Plaintiff’s Notice of Supplemental Authority (Doc. No. 24), and Defendant’s Response (Doc. No. 25) and all related submissions, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Renewed Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation is DENIED. (Doc. No. 19.) AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Paul S. Diamond _________________________ Paul S. Diamond, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?