WHITE v. SUNOCO INC.
Filing
27
ORDER THAT DEFT'S RENEWED MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY LITIGATION IS DENIED. (DOC. NO. 19). SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 5/24/16. 5/24/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DONALD WHITE, on behalf
of himself and all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
SUNOCO INC.,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civ. No. 15-4595
ORDER
AND NOW, this 24th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant Sunoco’s
Renewed Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation (Doc. No. 19), Plaintiff’s Response
(Doc. No. 20), Defendant’s Reply (Doc. No. 23), Plaintiff’s Notice of Supplemental Authority
(Doc. No. 24), and Defendant’s Response (Doc. No. 25) and all related submissions, it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendant’s Renewed Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation is
DENIED. (Doc. No. 19.)
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Paul S. Diamond
_________________________
Paul S. Diamond, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?