MCKINNEY v. NUTTER et al

Filing 13

ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 7 , IS GRANTED; DEFENDANT VINCENT CORRIGAN IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; PLAINTIFFS CLAIM REGARDING THE PRISONS FAILURE TO RESPOND TO GRIEVANCES IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; ALL OF PLAINTIFFS REMAINING CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND PLAINTIFF MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN MARCH 31, 2017, OR THIS ACTION WILL BE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 3/8/17. 3/9/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(mas, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
__________________________________________
DALE MCKINNEY,

:
:
:
v.
:
:
MICHAEL NUTTER; LOUIS GIORLA;
:
M. FARRELL; MAJOR ABELLO; and
:
VINCENT CORRIGAN,
:
Defendants.
:
__________________________________________
Plaintiff,

No. 2:15-cv-04671

ORDER
AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2017, for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued
this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.

The Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 7, is GRANTED;

2.

Defendant Vincent Corrigan is DISMISSED with prejudice;

3.

Plaintiff’s claim regarding the prison’s failure to respond to grievances is

DISMISSED with prejudice;
4.

All of Plaintiff’s remaining claims are DISMISSED without prejudice; and

5.

Plaintiff may file an amended complaint no later than March 31, 2017, or this

action will be closed.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr.__________
JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR.
United States District Judge