FURNITURE SOLUTIONS & RESOURCES et al v. SYMMETRY OFFICE et al
Filing
19
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, 10 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT SAID MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 12/21/15. 12/22/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
FURNITURE SOLUTIONS & RESOURCES,
Plaintiff,
v.
SYMMETRY OFFICE, LLC,
JAMES BALDWIN & JOSHUA PHILLIPS,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-4774
ORDER
AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion
to Dismiss, (Dkt No. 10), Plaintiff’s Response, (Dkt No. 13), and the parties’ supplemental
filings regarding choice of law, (Dkt Nos. 15-16), it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion is
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART:
1. Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED insofar as:
a. Plaintiff’s claim for breach of contract against Defendants James Baldwin
and Joshua Phillips (Count I) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
b. Plaintiff’s claim for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing
against all Defendants (Count II) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
c. Plaintiff’s claim for unjust enrichment against Defendant Symmetry
(Count III) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
d. Plaintiff’s claim for tortious interference against all Defendants (Count
IV) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
e. Plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
2. Defendants’ Motion is DENIED insofar as:
a. Plaintiff’s claim for unjust enrichment against Defendants James Baldwin
and Joshua Phillips (Count III) REMAINS PENDING.
1
Thus, Plaintiff’s claim for breach of contract against Defendant Symmetry (Count I) and
claim for unjust enrichment against Defendants James Baldwin and Joshua Phillips (Count III)
remain.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ C. Darnell Jones, II
_____________________________
C. Darnell Jones, II J.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?