KINT v. PITKINS et al

Filing 25

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. FIGUEROA'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, IS DENIED, AS OUTLINED HEREIN. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 12/16/2016. 12/16/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(amas)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TYSON A. KINT
v.
MR. PATRICK PITKINS
SUPERINTENDENT, et al.

:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
No. 15-4788

ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2016, upon careful and independent
consideration of Petitioner Tyson A. Kint’s pro se Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of
Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody, and after review of the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter, to which no objections
have been filed,1 it is ORDERED:
1.

The Report and Recommendation (Document 23) is APPROVED and

ADOPTED;
2.

Figueroa’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document 2) is DENIED; and

3.

Figueroa having failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right, a certificate of appealability shall not issue.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, J.

1

.

The Report and Recommendation was sent to all parties of record on November 17, 2016,
together with a Notice from the Clerk of Court advising the parties of their obligation to file any
objections within 14 days after service of the Notice. See Local R. Civ. P. 72.1 IV(b) (“Any
party may object to a magistrate judge’s proposed findings, recommendations or report under 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and subsections 1(c) and (d) of this Rule within fourteen (14) days after
being served with a copy thereof.”). As of today’s date, no objections have been filed.