BATISTA v. NUTTER et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 9 ) IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT. PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT SHALL BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 8/4/17. 8/8/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(mas, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MAYOR MICHAEL NUTTER, et al.,
AND NOW, this 4th day of August, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants’
Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 9), and all supporting and opposing papers, and for the
reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as
1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 9) is DENIED.
2. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to amend the complaint.
3. Plaintiff’s amended complaint shall be filed within thirty (30) days of the date
of this Order.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?