VILLAROSA v. NORTH COVENTRY TOWNSHIP et al

Filing 24

ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 8) IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 7/28/16. 7/28/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHRISTA VILLAROSA, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-4975 v. NORTH COVENTRY TOWNSHIP, et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 28th day of July 2016, upon consideration of the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 6), the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Defendants North Coventry Township, Sergeant Robert W. Malason, and Police Officer Victor Machese (“Defendants”) (Doc. No. 8), Plaintiff’s Answer to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 9), Defendants’ Reply (Doc. No. 10), Plaintiff’s Supplemental Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 14), Defendants’ Supplemental Brief (Doc. No. 15), Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Supplemental Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 20), the arguments of the parties at the January 5, 2016 hearing, and in accordance with the Court’s Opinion issued this day, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 8) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: / s / J oel H. S l om s k y JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?