PERSONS v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al

Filing 9

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND AFTER REVIEW OF THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 6 IS DENIED. THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 3/4/16. 3/8/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(gs)

' IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RANDY PERSONS,
CIVIL ACTION

Petitioner,

v.
N0.15-5075

FILED

PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, et al.,
Respondents.

MAR 0 7 2016

ORDER

MICHA~JIJNL..

_,,_::

By~Der. C~:.

AND NOW, this

j'l'f

, 2016, upon

day of

careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2241, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is
DISMISSED as MOOT.
3. Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc No. 6) is DENIED.
1

4. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

BY THE COURT:

GERALD A. MCHUGH,

J.