NGYUEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
Filing
48
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 30 ) IS DENIED, AND DEFENDANTS CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 32 ) IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 11/6/17. 11/6/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TAM THANH NGYUEN,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-5082
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,
et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 6th day of November 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 30), Defendant Jarret Bromberg’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(Doc. No. 32), Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(Doc. No. 36), Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No.
40), the Supplemental Brief in Support of Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 43), the arguments of counsel for the parties at the July 14, 2017
hearing, and in accordance with the Opinion issued by the Court on this day, it is ORDERED
that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 30) is DENIED, and Defendant’s
Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 32) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall
close this case for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/ s / J oel H. S l om s k y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?