NGYUEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al

Filing 48

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 30 ) IS DENIED, AND DEFENDANTS CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 32 ) IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 11/6/17. 11/6/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TAM THANH NGYUEN, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-5082 v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 6th day of November 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 30), Defendant Jarret Bromberg’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 32), Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 36), Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 40), the Supplemental Brief in Support of Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 43), the arguments of counsel for the parties at the July 14, 2017 hearing, and in accordance with the Opinion issued by the Court on this day, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 30) is DENIED, and Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 32) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: / s / J oel H. S l om s k y JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?