REDMOND v. GLUNT et al

Filing 31

ORDER THAT THE OBJECTIONS ARE OVERERULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILTY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 7/10/17. 7/11/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAVID REDMOND v. STEVEN GLUNT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-5116 ORDER NOW, this 10th day of July, 2019, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski (Docket No. 24), and the petitioner=s Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that: 1. The petitioner=s objections are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Sitarski is APPROVED and ADOPTED1; 3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and, 4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability. /s/TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE 1 The Magistrate Judge=s recitation of the factual and procedural history is accurate. Her legal analysis is thorough and correct. We can add nothing to her well-reasoned and exhaustive report.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?