REDMOND v. GLUNT et al
Filing
31
ORDER THAT THE OBJECTIONS ARE OVERERULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILTY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 7/10/17. 7/11/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DAVID REDMOND
v.
STEVEN GLUNT, THE DISTRICT
ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF
PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
PENNSYLVANIA
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-5116
ORDER
NOW, this 10th day of July, 2019, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of
Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,
the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A.
Sitarski (Docket No. 24), and the petitioner=s Objections to the Report and
Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is
ORDERED that:
1.
The petitioner=s objections are OVERRULED;
2.
The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Sitarski is
APPROVED and ADOPTED1;
3.
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and,
4.
There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
/s/TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE
1
The Magistrate Judge=s recitation of the factual and procedural history is accurate. Her legal analysis is
thorough and correct. We can add nothing to her well-reasoned and exhaustive report.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?