LOEFFLER THOMAS P.C. v. FISHMAN et al
Filing
95
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT 68 , IT IS ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 8/11/16. 8/11/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LOEFFLER THOMAS P.C. f/k/a
LOEFFLER THOMAS TOUZALIN LLP
:
:
:
:
:
:
v.
SIMON FISHMAN, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-5194
ORDER
AND NOW, this
11th
day of
August
, 2016, upon consideration of
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint to Clarify Their Allegations
Regarding the Statute of Limitations and Fraudulent Concealment (ECF No. 68), and all
documents submitted in support therefore, and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the
Motion is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
_______________________________
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?