LOEFFLER THOMAS P.C. v. FISHMAN et al

Filing 95

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT 68 , IT IS ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 8/11/16. 8/11/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LOEFFLER THOMAS P.C. f/k/a LOEFFLER THOMAS TOUZALIN LLP : : : : : : v. SIMON FISHMAN, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-5194 ORDER AND NOW, this 11th day of August , 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint to Clarify Their Allegations Regarding the Statute of Limitations and Fraudulent Concealment (ECF No. 68), and all documents submitted in support therefore, and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. BY THE COURT: _______________________________ R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?