MESSNER v. USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al

Filing 44

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELEIFE UNDER RULE 60 (b) AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DENIED, PLAINTIFF SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER AND ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 9/19/16. 9/19/16 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEVEN P. MESSNER v. CIVIL ACTION N0.15-5427 USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al ORDER AND NOW, this 19th day of September 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Motion for relief under Rule 60(b) and for leave to file a second amended complaint (ECF Doc. No. 38), Defendants' Response (ECF Doc. No. 42) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Plaintiff's motion (ECF Doc. No. 38) is DENIED. Plaintiff shall immediately notify the Circuit Clerk of the entry of this Order and accompanying Memorandum.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?