ARDITI v. SUBERS et al

Filing 116

ORDERED THAT DOCKET NO. 103 - DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE ANY TESTIMONY, EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENT THAT PLAINTIFF SUFFERED ANY PHYSICAL INJURIES ON MAY 31, 2015 IS DENIED. ORDERED THAT DOCKET NO. 104 - DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE ANY TESTIMONY, EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENT RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CITATION TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S ACQUITTAL IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 1/9/17. 1/10/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RAY A. ARDITI, Plaintiff, v. POLICE OFFICER RICHARD SUBERS, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 15-5511 ORDER AND NOW, this 9th day of January, 2017, upon consideration of the Defendants’ Joint Motion in Limine to Preclude Any Testimony, Evidence or Argument that Plaintiff Suffered any Physical Injuries on May 31, 2015 (Docket No. 103), Defendants’ Joint Motion in Limine to Preclude Any Testimony, Evidence or Argument Relating to the Issuance of a Citation to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s Acquittal (Docket No. 104), and Plaintiff’s Responses thereto (Docket Nos. 110, 111), and following a Chambers conference on January 6, 2017, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ Motion (Docket No. 103) is DENIED. 2. Defendants’ Motion (Docket No. 104) is GRANTED. BY THE COURT: S/Gene E.K. Pratter GENE E.K. PRATTER United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?