ARDITI v. SUBERS et al

Filing 56

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT RANDOLPH MCGOLDRICK'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 48) IS GRANTED. COUNTS I AND II OF PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED AS TO DEFENDANT RANDOLPH MCGOLDRICK ONLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 6/15/16. 6/16/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RAY A. ARDITI, Plaintiff, v. POLICE OFFICER RICHARD SUBERS, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 15-5511 ORDER AND NOW, this ____ day of June, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant Randolph McGoldrick’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 48) and Plaintiff’s Opposition thereto (Docket No. 54), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion (Docket No. 48) is GRANTED. Counts I and II of Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint are DISMISSED as to Defendant Randolph McGoldrick only. 1 BY THE COURT: S/Gene E.K. Pratter GENE E.K. PRATTER United States District Judge 1 Because Chief McGoldrick did not move to dismiss Counts III and IV, he remains a Defendant in this case.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?