ARDITI v. SUBERS et al

Filing 92

Ordered THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOCKET NO. 78), OFFICER CLYMER'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOCKET NO. 80), DEFENDANT CHRIS NAEGELE'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOCKET NO. 82) AND CHARLES YOUNG'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOCKET NO. 84) ARE DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 12/16/16. 12/16/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RAY A. ARDITI,
Plaintiff,
v.
POLICE OFFICER RICHARD SUBERS,
et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

No. 15-5511

ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion
for Reconsideration (Docket No. 78), Officer Clymer’s Motion for Reconsideration (Docket No.
80), Defendant Chris Naegele’s Motion for Reconsideration (Docket No. 82), Defendant Charles
Young’s Motion for Reconsideration (Docket No. 84), and the Responses and Replies thereto
(Docket Nos. 79, 81, 83, 85-88), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motions (Docket Nos. 78, 80,
82, 84) are DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
United States District Judge