ESKRIDGE v. PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THIS CASE SHALL BE MARKED CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 3/8/17. 3/8/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AUTHORITY, JOANNE STRAUSS, AND
AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants’ Second
Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 54), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (ECF No. 58),
and Defendants’ Reply (ECF No. 60) it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED.
(1) Plaintiff’s remaining Title VII and PHRA retaliation claims concerning actions that
occurred following his return from leave on October 15, 2014 (Count I) are
(2) Plaintiff’s remaining 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for First Amendment retaliation
concerning actions that occurred following his return from leave on October 15, 2014
(Count II) is DISMISSED; and,
(3) Plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s
Equal Protection Clause (Count III) is DISMISSED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be marked as CLOSED for statistical
BY THE COURT:
/S/WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.
WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?