ESKRIDGE v. PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al

Filing 62

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THIS CASE SHALL BE MARKED CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 3/8/17. 3/8/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GLENN ESKRIDGE, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, JOANNE STRAUSS, AND KELVIN JEREMIAH, Defendants. NO. 15-5576 ORDER AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants’ Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 54), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (ECF No. 58), and Defendants’ Reply (ECF No. 60) it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. (1) Plaintiff’s remaining Title VII and PHRA retaliation claims concerning actions that occurred following his return from leave on October 15, 2014 (Count I) are DISMISSED. (2) Plaintiff’s remaining 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for First Amendment retaliation concerning actions that occurred following his return from leave on October 15, 2014 (Count II) is DISMISSED; and, (3) Plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause (Count III) is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be marked as CLOSED for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /S/WENDY BEETLESTONE, J. _______________________________ WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?