ALLAH v. THOMAS et al
Ordered THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOCKET NOS. 12 AND 13) ARE GRANTED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN ANSWER TO THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (DOCKET NO. 11) IS DENIED AS MOOT AND THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 6/14/16. 6/14/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(rab, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL MALIK ALLAH,
JOHN C. THOMAS, et al.,
AND NOW, this 14th day of June, 2016, upon consideration of the defendants’ two
motions to dismiss the complaint (Doc. Nos. 12 and 13), the defendants’ Motion for an
Extension of Time to File an Answer to the Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 11), and the
Complaint itself (Doc. No. 3), it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants’ motions to dismiss
are both GRANTED, the defendants’ Motion for an Extension of Time is DENIED AS MOOT,
and the Complaint is DISMISSED.
The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes, including statistics.
BY THE COURT:
S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?