WOLDSMIT v. MOONEY et al

Filing 19

ORDER THAT THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND THERE IS NO CASUE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 5/18/16. 5/18/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
HARRY WOLDSMIT
v.
VINCENT F. MOONEY, DISTRICT
ATTORNEY OF COUNTY OF
PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
PENNSYLVANIA

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 15-5607

ORDER
NOW, this 18th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of
Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the Response to the Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus, the petitioner’s ”Traverse Response”, the Report and Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter (Document No. 13), the petitioner’s Objections
to the Report and Recommendation (Document No. 17), and after a thorough and
independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:
1.

The petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED;

2.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Rueter is APPROVED

and ADOPTED;
3.

The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and,

4.

There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

/s/Timothy J. Savage
TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.