R.J. et al v. DUMARESQ et al
ORDER THAT PLFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLFFS & AGAINST DEFTS AS TO LIABILITY FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES ONLY. PLFFS SHALL FILE A MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES IN A SPECIFIC AMOUNT ON OR BEFORE 9/11/2017.SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 8/9/17. 8/9/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
R.J., et al.
AUG -9 2017
PEDRO RIVERA, et al.
KATE BARKMAN. Clerk:
AND NOW, this 9th day of August, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion for
Summary Judgment (Docket No. 23), Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No.
24), all documents filed in connection therewith, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying
Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.
JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants as to
liability for attorneys' fees only.
Plaintiffs shall file a motion for an award of attorneys' fees in a specific amount on
or before September 11, 201 7.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?