ULMAN v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC. et al

Filing 68

MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 55 ), IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS C.A.V. ENTERPRISE, LLC AND AKOS GUBICA'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 44 ), IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT SABRINA ANDERSON AND GREYHOUND L INES, INC.'S MOTION TO STAY (DOC. NO. 46 ), IS DENIED AS MOOT. ON OR BEFORE 1/5/2018, THE PARTIES SHALL FILE A JOINTLY PREPARED STATUS REPORT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 12/14/2017. 12/15/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AMALIA ULMAN
Plaintiff,
v.
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.;
SABRINA ANDERSON;
C.A.V. ENTERPRISE, LLC; and,
AKOS GUBICA
Defendants.

:

:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-5838
:

:

ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of December, 2017, upon consideration of: Defendants C.A.V.
Enterprise, LLC and Akos Gubica’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 44), Plaintiff’s Response (ECF
No. 44), and Defendants Sabrina Anderson and Greyhound Lines, Inc.’s Opposition thereto
(ECF No. 48); Defendants Sabrina Anderson and Greyhound Lines, Inc.’s Motion to Stay (ECF
No. 46), Defendants C.A.V. Enterprise, LLC and Akos Gubica’s Response (ECF No. 50), and
Plaintiff’s Opposition thereto (ECF No. 51); and, Plaintiff’s Partial Motion for Summary
Judgment (ECF No. 55), Defendants Sabrina Anderson and Greyhound Lines, Inc.’s Opposition
thereto (ECF No. 61), and Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants Sabrina Anderson and Greyhound
Lines, Inc.’s Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (ECF No. 64), it is hereby ORDERED as
follows:
(1)

Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 55) is
GRANTED;

(2)

Defendants C.A.V. Enterprise, LLC and Akos Gubica’s Motion to
Dismiss (ECF No. 44) is GRANTED;

(3)

Defendants Sabrina Anderson and Greyhound Lines, Inc.’s Motion to Stay
(ECF No. 46) is DENIED as moot; and,

Page 1 of 2

(4)

On or before January 5, 2018, the parties shall file a jointly prepared
status report. 1

BY THE COURT:

/s/ C. Darnell Jones, II

1

J.

Said report shall inform the court as to whether the parties would be willing to further
engage in settlement efforts with Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski or be amenable to
participating in the Court-Annexed Mediation Program at no cost to either side. A list of
approved mediators participating in the Program may be found at:
http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents2/mediation. In the event counsel are of the reasonable
belief that there is no possibility of settlement, they shall indicate so in their report so that a date
for trial may be set by the court.
Page 2 of 2