STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. STAVROPOLSKIY et al
Filing
122
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT, LEONARD STAVROPOLSKIY, et al.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. DEFENDANT STATE FARM'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN CASE 16-1374. ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 9/27/2018. 9/28/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
LEONARD STAVROPOLSKIY, PT., D.C.,
et al.
Defendant.
___________________________________
EASTERN APPROACH REHABILITATION
LLC, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-05929
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-01374
ORDER
And NOW, this
25th
day of September, 2018, upon
consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc.
96-2), Plaintiffs’ Response thereto (Doc. 100), Defendants’
Reply to Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment
(Doc. 104), Plaintiffs’ Sur-Reply to Defendants’ Reply
to Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment (Doc. 109), as well as Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment (Doc 97), Defendants’ Response thereto (Doc.
98), Plaintiffs’ Reply to Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 105), and Defendants’
Sur-Reply to Plaintiffs’ Reply to Defendants’ Response to
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 108), it
is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant, Leonard Stavropolskiy, PT., D.C., et al.’s
Motion for Summary Judgment, Case NO. 15-cv-05929, is
DENIED.
2. Defendant
State
Farm’s
Motion
for
Partial
Judgment is GRANTED in Case No. 16-cv-01374.
Summary
Plaintiffs’
Eastern Approach Rehabilitation LLC, et al.’s claims for
treble
damages
under
Count
I
of
their
complaint
are
dismissed.
BY THE COURT:
s/J. Curtis Joyner______
J. CURTIS JOYNER, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?