STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. STAVROPOLSKIY et al
Filing
29
ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. 22 ) IS DENIED FOR THE REASONS DISCUSSED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 5/16/2016. 5/18/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.,
ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
LEONARD STAVROPOLSKIY, ET AL.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-cv-5929
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (Doc.
No. 22), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 25),
Defendants’ Reply in Further Support thereof (Doc. No. 26), and
Plaintiffs’ Sur-reply is Further Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 27),
it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED for the reasons
discussed in the accompanying memorandum.
BY THE COURT:
s/J. Curtis Joyner
J. CURTIS JOYNER, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?