DIDONATO v. U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC.

Filing 43

ORDER THAT DEFT U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: THE MOTION IS GRANTED INSOFAR AS IT SEEKS DISMISSAL OF COUNTS II & III OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. MOTION IS DENIED INSOFAR AS I T SEEKS DISMISSAL OF COUNT I OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. MOTION IS DENIED INSOFAR AS IT SEEKS JUDGEMNT IN FAVOR OF U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT ON ITS COUNTERCLAIM. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT & AGAINST PLFF AS TO COUNTS II & III OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT.SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 8/17/17. 8/17/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE PARTY.(kw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GREGORY DIDONATO d/b/a
SYNDICATED REPORTERS, INC.
v.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. and
JOSEPH J. SARACO

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 15-6035

ORDER
AND NOW, this 17th day of August, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant U.S. Legal
Support, Inc.’s “Motion for Summary Judgment” (Docket No. 28), all documents filed in
connection therewith, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as
follows:
1. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as it seeks dismissal of Counts II and III of the
Amended Complaint.
2. The Motion is DENIED insofar as it seeks dismissal of Count I of the Amended
Complaint.
3. The Motion is DENIED insofar as it seeks judgment in favor of U.S. Legal Support on
its Counterclaim.
4. JUDGEMENT IS ENTERED in favor of U.S. Legal Support and against Plaintiff as to
Counts II and III of the Amended Complaint.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ John R. Padova, J.
John R. Padova, J.