DIDONATO v. U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC.
ORDER THAT DEFT U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: THE MOTION IS GRANTED INSOFAR AS IT SEEKS DISMISSAL OF COUNTS II & III OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. MOTION IS DENIED INSOFAR AS I T SEEKS DISMISSAL OF COUNT I OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. MOTION IS DENIED INSOFAR AS IT SEEKS JUDGEMNT IN FAVOR OF U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT ON ITS COUNTERCLAIM. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT & AGAINST PLFF AS TO COUNTS II & III OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT.SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 8/17/17. 8/17/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE PARTY.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GREGORY DIDONATO d/b/a
SYNDICATED REPORTERS, INC.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. and
JOSEPH J. SARACO
AND NOW, this 17th day of August, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant U.S. Legal
Support, Inc.’s “Motion for Summary Judgment” (Docket No. 28), all documents filed in
connection therewith, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as
1. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as it seeks dismissal of Counts II and III of the
2. The Motion is DENIED insofar as it seeks dismissal of Count I of the Amended
3. The Motion is DENIED insofar as it seeks judgment in favor of U.S. Legal Support on
4. JUDGEMENT IS ENTERED in favor of U.S. Legal Support and against Plaintiff as to
Counts II and III of the Amended Complaint.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ John R. Padova, J.
John R. Padova, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?