HAYMAKER v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Filing 24

ORDER THAT HAYMAKER'S MOTION IS DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS ARE GRANTED. HAYMAKER'S CLAIMS ARE ACCORDINGLY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 4/27/16. 4/28/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SIDNEY L. HAYMAKER,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-06306

v.
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE
CO., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motions to
Dismiss (ECF Nos. 5, 13), Plaintiff Sidney L. Haymaker’s (“Haymaker”) Responses (ECF Nos.
11, 15) and Defendants’ Replies (ECF Nos. 12, 16), along with Haymaker’s Miscellaneous
Motion asking the Court not to draw any adverse inferences for her counsel’s failure to appear at
oral argument (ECF No. 22), it is ORDERED that:
1. Haymaker’s motion is DENIED as moot;1
2. Defendants’ motions are GRANTED;
3. Haymaker’s claims are accordingly DISMISSED with prejudice; and
4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

1

The Court accepts counsel’s explanation and has not drawn any adverse inferences for his failure to appear
at oral argument.

1