HAYMAKER v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
ORDER THAT HAYMAKER'S MOTION IS DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS ARE GRANTED. HAYMAKER'S CLAIMS ARE ACCORDINGLY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 4/27/16. 4/28/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SIDNEY L. HAYMAKER,
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE
CO., et al.,
AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motions to
Dismiss (ECF Nos. 5, 13), Plaintiff Sidney L. Haymaker’s (“Haymaker”) Responses (ECF Nos.
11, 15) and Defendants’ Replies (ECF Nos. 12, 16), along with Haymaker’s Miscellaneous
Motion asking the Court not to draw any adverse inferences for her counsel’s failure to appear at
oral argument (ECF No. 22), it is ORDERED that:
1. Haymaker’s motion is DENIED as moot;1
2. Defendants’ motions are GRANTED;
3. Haymaker’s claims are accordingly DISMISSED with prejudice; and
4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
The Court accepts counsel’s explanation and has not drawn any adverse inferences for his failure to appear
at oral argument.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?