JEFFRESS v. OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Filing 19

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S JURY DEMAND [#6] IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF BROOKE JEFFRESS'S DEMAND FOR A JURY TRIAL IS STRICKEN; PURSUANT TO FRCP 39(A), THE CLERK OF COURT SHA LL STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S JURY TRIAL DEMAND FROM THE DOCKET; AND BECAUSE OF THE INADVERTENT INCLUSION OF CERTAIN PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN REDACTED, THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL STRIKE AND REMOVE FROM THE DOCKET THE EXHIBITS ATTACHED TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S JURY DEMAND [#16] AND SHALL DOCKET INSTEAD THOSE PROPERLY REDACTED EXHIBITS PROVIDED BY THE DEFENDANT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE STEWART DALZELL ON 5/26/16. 5/26/16 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BROOKE JEFFRESS v. OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-6330 ORDER AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of defendant Ocwen Financial Corporation’s motion to strike plaintiff’s jury demand (docket entry #16) and plaintiff Brooke Jeffress’s response in opposition thereto, and for the reasons set forth in our Memorandum issued this day, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Ocwen Financial Corporation’s motion to strike plaintiff’s jury demand (docket entry #16) is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff Brooke Jeffress’s demand for a jury trial is STRICKEN; 3. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 39(a), the Clerk of Court shall STRIKE plaintiff’s jury trial demand from the docket; and 4. Because of the inadvertent inclusion of certain personal identifying information that should have been redacted, the Clerk of Court shall STRIKE and REMOVE from the docket the exhibits attached to defendant’s motion to strike plaintiff’s jury demand (docket entry #16) and shall DOCKET instead those properly redacted exhibits provided by the defendant. BY THE COURT: __/s/ Stewart Dalzell, J. Stewart Dalzell, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?