JEFFRESS v. OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Filing 40

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION FROM DEFENDANT 34 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS REGARDS PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST THAT DEFENDANT BE DIRE CTED TO SET FORTH IN A FORMAL WRITTEN DISCOVERY RESPONSE THAT, AFTER DILIGENT INQUIRY, IT HAS DETERMINED THAT IT IS NOT IN POSSESSION OR CONTROL OF ANY DOCUMENTS OR INFORMATION, OTHER THAN THOSE IS HAS PROVIDED, EXCEPT WHERE IT HAS MADE A DETAILED OB JECTION; THE MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO ITEMS 1,2,6,7 AND 8; THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS SPECIFIED IN THE ACCOMPANYING OPINION WITH RESPECT TO ITEMS 3,11 AND 12; THE MOTION IS DISMISSED AS MOOT WITH RESPECT TO ITEM 5; A ND THE MOTION IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO ITEMS 4,9 AND 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT OCWEN'S PRODUCTIONS IN RESPONSE TO THIS ORDER SHALL BE MADE ON OR BEFORE THURSDAY, 11/10/16. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE JACOB P. HART ON 10/26/16. 10/27/16 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BROOKE JEFFRESS
v.
OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 15-6330

ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of October, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to
Compel Production of Documents and Information from Defendant, filed in this matter as
Document No. 34, and Defendant’s Response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. The Motion is GRANTED as regards Plaintiff’s request that Defendant be directed to
set forth in a formal written discovery response that, after diligent inquiry, it has
determined that it is not in possession or control of any documents or information, other
than those it has provided, except where it has made a detailed objection;
2. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to items 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8;
3. The Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as specified in the
accompanying Opinion with respect to items 3, 11 and 12;
4. The Motion is DISMISSED AS MOOT with respect to item 5; and
5. The Motion is DENIED with respect to items 4, 9 and 10.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that Ocwen’s productions in response to this Order shall be
made on or before Thursday, November 10, 2016.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Jacob P. Hart
_______________________________
JACOB P. HART
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE