IN RE: EARL WILSON

Filing 14

Ordered THAT THE COURT IS AFFIRMING THE BANKRUPTCY COURT'S FINDING THAT THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LACKED STANDING TO OBJECT TO THE PROVISION OF THE REVISED FIFTH AMENDED PLAN PERMITTING MR. WILSON TO PAY THE REDEMPTION AMOUNT OVER THE TERM OF THE REVISED FIFTH AMENDED PLAN. ALL OTHER ISSUES ON APPEAL ARE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF STANDING AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR ALL PURPOSES INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 12/27/16. 12/28/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : IN RE: EARL WILSON CIVIL ACTION No. 15-6385 (BANKRUPTCY No. 14-12720) Order AND NOW, this 27th day of December 2016, upon consideration of the Order of the Bankruptcy Court dated November 17, 2015 and corresponding written Memorandum Opinion, Appellant’s Brief (Doc. Nos. 6-7), Appellee’s Brief (Doc. No. 11), Appellant’s Reply (Doc. No. 12), and the record on appeal, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Bankruptcy Court’s finding that the City of Philadelphia lacked standing to object to the provision of the Revised Fifth Amended Plan permitting Mr. Wilson to pay the redemption amount over the term of the Revised Fifth Amended Plan is AFFIRMED; 2. All other issues on appeal are DISMISSED for lack of standing; and 3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for all purposes including statistics. BY THE COURT: S/Gene E.K. Pratter GENE E.K. PRATTER United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?