KING v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI GRATERFORD et al
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISITCAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 11/3/16. 11/4/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SCI-GRATERFORD, et al.,
AND NOW, this _3rd_ day of November, 2016, upon consideration of the Petition for
Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1), the Response to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 11),
the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells
(Doc. 12), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16), IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; and
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case as closed for
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Petrese B. Tucker
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, C.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?