KING v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI GRATERFORD et al

Filing 18

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISITCAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 11/3/16. 11/4/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JEROME KING,
Petitioner,
v.
SUPERINTENDENT,
SCI-GRATERFORD, et al.,
Respondents.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-6508

ORDER
AND NOW, this _3rd_ day of November, 2016, upon consideration of the Petition for
Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1), the Response to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 11),
the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells
(Doc. 12), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16), IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; and
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case as closed for
statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Petrese B. Tucker
_________________________
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, C.J.