DANON v. VANGUARD GROUP, INC.
Filing
21
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO FILE A SUR-REPLY 18 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT SAID MOTION IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S SUR-RELY, ATTACHED AS EXHIBITS A AND B TO PLAINTIFF'S MO TION. FURTHER, UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT 6 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT SAID MOTION IS GRANTED FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE COURT'S ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL AND ALL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 5/23/16. 5/24/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DAVID DANON,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE VANGUARD GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-6864
ORDER
AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to file
a Sur-Reply, (Dkt No. 18), and Defendant’s Response in Opposition thereto, (Dkt No. 19), it is
hereby ORDERED that said Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to file
Plaintiff’s Sur-Reply, attached as Exhibits A and B to Plaintiff’s Motion.
FURTHER, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint,
(Dkt No. 6), and Memorandum of Law in Support thereof, (Dkt No. 6-2), Plaintiff’s Response in
opposition thereto, (Dkt No. 10), Defendant’s Reply in support thereof, (Dkt No. 16), Plaintiff’s
Sur-Reply in opposition thereto, and the amicus curiae brief filed by the Securities and Exchange
Commission, (Dkt No. 13), it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion is GRANTED for the
reasons stated in the Court’s accompanying Memorandum Opinion. Plaintiff’s Complaint is
dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case for statistical and all
purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ C. Darnell Jones, II
_____________________________
C. Darnell Jones, II J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?