SAGE TITLE GROUP, LLC v. KERSEY et al

Filing 55

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MONA LISA KERSEY-MONTEITH, MICHAEL KERSEY, AND MORRIS KERSEY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 45 ) IS GRANTED AND DEFENDANT MERRITT KERSEY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. [46) IS DENIED. THEREFORE, LILL IE KERSEY'S ESTATE, MONA LISA KERSEY-MONTEITH, MICHAEL KERSEY, MORRIS KERSEY, AND MERRITT KERSEY ARE EACH ENTITLED TO AN EQUAL 20% SHARE IN THE NET PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AFTER THE PAYMENT OF PLAINTIFF, SAGE TITLE GROUPS' ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 2/17/2017. 2/17/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (aeg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SAGE TITLE GROUPS, LLC d/b/a SAGE PREMIER SETTLEMENTS, Plaintiff, v. LILLIE E. KERSEY, MERRITT KERSEY, MICHAEL J. KERSEY, MORRIS F. KERSEY, and MONA LISA KERSEY a/k/a MONA LISA KERSEY-MONTEITH, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 16-03 ORDER AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants, Mona Lisa Kersey-Monteith, Michael Kersey, and Morris Kersey’s (collectively “Siblings”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 45), Defendant, Merritt Kersey’s (“Merritt”), both Individually and Executor of the Estate of Lillie E. Kersey, Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 46), Siblings’ Response in Opposition to Merritt’s Motion, and Merritt’s Response in Opposition to Siblings’ Motion, it is hereby ORDERED that Siblings’ Motion is GRANTED and Merritt’s Motion is DENIED. Therefore, Lillie Kersey’s estate, Mona Lisa Kersey-Monteith, Michael Kersey, Morris Kersey, and Merritt Kersey are each entitled to an equal twenty percent (20%) share in the net proceeds from the sale of the subject property after the payment of Plaintiff, Sage Title Groups’ attorneys’ fees and costs. BY THE COURT: /s/ Robert F. Kelly ROBERT F. KELLY SENIOR JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?