SAGE TITLE GROUP, LLC v. KERSEY et al

Filing 55

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MONA LISA KERSEY-MONTEITH, MICHAEL KERSEY, AND MORRIS KERSEY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 45 ) IS GRANTED AND DEFENDANT MERRITT KERSEY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. [46) IS DENIED. THEREFORE, LILL IE KERSEY'S ESTATE, MONA LISA KERSEY-MONTEITH, MICHAEL KERSEY, MORRIS KERSEY, AND MERRITT KERSEY ARE EACH ENTITLED TO AN EQUAL 20% SHARE IN THE NET PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AFTER THE PAYMENT OF PLAINTIFF, SAGE TITLE GROUPS' ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 2/17/2017. 2/17/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (aeg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SAGE TITLE GROUPS, LLC
d/b/a SAGE PREMIER SETTLEMENTS,
Plaintiff,
v.
LILLIE E. KERSEY, MERRITT KERSEY,
MICHAEL J. KERSEY, MORRIS F. KERSEY,
and MONA LISA KERSEY a/k/a MONA LISA
KERSEY-MONTEITH,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

No. 16-03

ORDER
AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants, Mona
Lisa Kersey-Monteith, Michael Kersey, and Morris Kersey’s (collectively “Siblings”) Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 45), Defendant, Merritt Kersey’s (“Merritt”), both Individually and
Executor of the Estate of Lillie E. Kersey, Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 46), Siblings’
Response in Opposition to Merritt’s Motion, and Merritt’s Response in Opposition to Siblings’ Motion,
it is hereby ORDERED that Siblings’ Motion is GRANTED and Merritt’s Motion is DENIED.
Therefore, Lillie Kersey’s estate, Mona Lisa Kersey-Monteith, Michael Kersey, Morris Kersey, and
Merritt Kersey are each entitled to an equal twenty percent (20%) share in the net proceeds from the sale
of the subject property after the payment of Plaintiff, Sage Title Groups’ attorneys’ fees and costs.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Robert F. Kelly
ROBERT F. KELLY
SENIOR JUDGE