COACHTRANS, INC. v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Filing 19

MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 8 ), IS GRANTED. COUNT II IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. COUNTS I AND III ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL PRAYER FOR RELIEF IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT CONSISTENT WITH THE COURTS MEMORANDUN OPINION WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 8/19/2016. 8/19/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : : : COACHTRANS, INC., Plaintiff, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. CIVIL ACTION No. 16-88 ORDER AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant, Uber Technologies, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) “Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint” (Doc. No. 8), the Response in Opposition by Plaintiff, Coachtrans, Inc. (“Plaintiff”), Plaintiff’s Supplemental Prayer for Relief, and Defendant’s Reply in Further Support of its Motion to Dismiss, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 1. Count II is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. Counts I and III are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. Plaintiff’s Supplemental Prayer for Relief is DENIED. 4. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file an amended Complaint consistent with our Memorandum Opinion within fourteen (14) days of this Order. BY THE COURT: /s/ Robert F. Kelly ROBERT F. KELLY SENIOR JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?