COACHTRANS, INC. v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 8 ), IS GRANTED. COUNT II IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. COUNTS I AND III ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL PRAYER FOR RELIEF IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT CONSISTENT WITH THE COURTS MEMORANDUN OPINION WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 8/19/2016. 8/19/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
COACHTRANS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION
No. 16-88
ORDER
AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant,
Uber Technologies, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) “Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint” (Doc. No.
8), the Response in Opposition by Plaintiff, Coachtrans, Inc. (“Plaintiff”), Plaintiff’s
Supplemental Prayer for Relief, and Defendant’s Reply in Further Support of its Motion to
Dismiss, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:
1. Count II is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
2. Counts I and III are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
3. Plaintiff’s Supplemental Prayer for Relief is DENIED.
4. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file an amended Complaint consistent with our
Memorandum Opinion within fourteen (14) days of this Order.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Robert F. Kelly
ROBERT F. KELLY
SENIOR JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?