SCOTT v. FERGUSON et al
Filing
13
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 1 , RESPONSES THERETO 9 , THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI 10 , AND NO OBJECTIONS HAVING BEEN FILED, IT IS ORDERED THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDA TION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED. THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 9/15/16. 9/16/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(gs)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ADAM MICHAEL SCOTT
:
:
v.
:
:
TAMMY FERGUSON, THE DISTRICT :
ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF
:
CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY
:
GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
:
PENNSYLVANIA
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-0124
ORDER
NOW, this 15th day of September, 2016, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ
of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the responses to the Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus (Document No. 9), the Report and Recommendation filed by United States
Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski (Document 10), and no objections to the Report and
Recommendation having been filed, and after a thorough and independent review of the
record, it is ORDERED that:
1.
The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Sitarski is
APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2.
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and,
3.
There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
/s/Timothy J. Savage
TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?