K.D. et al v. DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

Filing 21

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD IS DENIED. THIS CASE IS CLOSED.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 8/31/2017. 9/1/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA K.D., a minor, by and through her parents, THERESA DUNN and JONATHAN DUNN, Plaintiff, v. DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0165 ORDER AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2017, upon consideration of the Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 12), the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 13), Defendant’s Response in Opposition to the Plaintiffs’ Motion (Doc. No. 14), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition to the Defendant’s Motion (Doc. No. 15), and the parties’ briefs on supplemental authority (Doc. Nos. 18, 19), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 12) is GRANTED. 2. The Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 13) is DENIED. 3. This case is CLOSED. BY THE COURT /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, C. J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?