WALKER v. AMTROL, INC. et al
Filing
59
ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 31) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 2/14/19. 2/15/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OBEDIAH WALKER III, As Executor of the
Estate of Obediah Walker, Jr.
MDL 875
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-215
v.
VIAD CORP,
Defendant.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of February 2019, upon consideration of Defendant Viad Corp’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 31), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 36), Defendant’s Reply in Support of its Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 37), Plaintiff’s Supplemental Response to Defendant’s Reply (Doc.
No. 54), the arguments of counsel for the parties at the hearing held on February 28, 2018, and in
accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 31) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/ s/ J oel H. S l om sk y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?