WALKER v. AMTROL, INC. et al

Filing 75

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PARTIES SHALL HAVE UNTIL 9/1/2019 TO COMPLETE FACT DISCOVERY ON THE LIMITED ISSUE OF DEFENDANT'S SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST DEFENSE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 7/1/2019. 7/1/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OBEDIAH WALKER III, As Executor of the
Estate of Obediah Walker, Jr.
MDL 875

Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-215

v.
VIAD CORP,
Defendant.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 1st day of July 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike
the Answer to the Complaint (Doc. No. 65), Defendant’s Response in Opposition to the Motion to
Strike (Doc. No. 68), and Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of his Motion (Doc. No. 69), it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 65) is DENIED. It is further ORDERED
that the parties shall have until September 1, 2019 to complete fact discovery on the limited issue
of Defendant’s successor in interest defense.

BY THE COURT:

/ s/ J oel H. S l om sk y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.