LASH v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
ORDER THAT RELIANCE & MATRIX'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 28) IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AS TO COUNTS I, II, & IV AS AGAINST MATRIX FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6), & MATRIX IS DISMISSED AS A DEFT TO THIS ACTION. THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 4/4/17. 4/4/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE
INSURANCE CO., et al.
AND NOW, this 4th day of April, 2017, upon consideration of Reliance and Matrix’s
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Docket No. 28), all documents filed in
connection therewith, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as
The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Counts I, II, and IV as against Matrix
for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and Matrix is DISMISSED as a Defendant to
The Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in all other respects.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ John R. Padova, J.
John R. Padova, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?