ARONIMINK GOLF CLUB, INC. v. E.I. DUPONT NEMOURS AND COMPANY

Filing 15

ORDER THAT DUPONT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, CONVERTED TO A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO RULE 56(d) IS DENIED. JUDGMEN T IN CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-283 IS ENTERED FOR DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-283 CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 8/14/2017. 8/14/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL. (SEE DOC. NO. 714 IN 11-MD-2284) (aeg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: IMPRELIS HERBICIDE MARKETING,
SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO:
Aronimink Golf Club, Inc. v. E.I du Pont Nemours & Co.

MDL No. 2284
l l-md-02284

Civil Action No.
16-283

ORDER

AND NOW, this

/~y of August, 2017, upon consideration of DuPont's Motion to

Dismiss (Docket No. 595), Plaintiffs Response (Docket No. 607), DuPont's Reply (Docket No.
610), Plaintiffs Request for Oral Argument (Docket No. 611 ), DuPont's supplemental filing
(Docket No. 665), and Plaintiffs supplemental filing/Motion for Extension of Time to Complete
Discovery Pursuant to Rule 56(d) (Docket No. 668), and following oral argument on June 30,
2016, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. DuPont's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 595), converted to a motion for summary
judgment, is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED.
2. Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery Pursuant to Rule
56(d) (Docket No. 668) is DENIED.
3. Judgment in Civil Action No. 16-283 is entered for Defendant and against Plaintiff.
4. The Clerk of Court shall mark Civil Action No. 16-283 CLOSED for all purposes,
including statistics.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE