MCGUCKIN v. BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST et al
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT [#8] IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 5/4/16. 5/5/16 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RICHARD M. McGUCKIN,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
v.
BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST, and
H. JEFFREY DEVUONO,
Defendants.
NO. 16-290
ORDER
AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 8, filed March 21, 2016), plaintiff’s
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended
Complaint (Doc. No. 9, filed April 4, 2016), and defendants’ Reply Brief to Plaintiff’s Response
in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Doc. No. 13, filed April 18,
2016), for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum dated May 4, 2016, IT IS
ORDERED that defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN
PART, as follows:
1.
That part of defendants’ Motion to Dismiss which seeks dismissal of plaintiff’s
claims for unjust enrichment and breach of contract contained in Counts III and IV of the
Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Counts III and IV of the Amended Complaint are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
2.
That part of defendants’ Motion to Dismiss which seeks dismissal of plaintiff’s
claims for age discrimination arising out of his termination from employment by defendants
contained in Counts VI and VII of the Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ claims for
age discrimination arising out of his termination contained in Counts VI and VII of the Amended
Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
3.
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a preliminary pretrial conference will be scheduled
in due course.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
DuBOIS, JAN E., J.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?