ROESELER v. COLVIN
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED. WE RESERVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S JUNE 20, 2014 DECISION AND REMAND CONSISTENT WITH JUDGE HEY'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 5/17/2017. 5/17/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL
AND NOW, this 17th day of May 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Request for
review (ECF Doc. No. 3), Defendant's Response (ECF Doc. No. 8), United States Magistrate Judge
Elizabeth T. Hey's April 28, 2017 Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. No. 13) with no
objections (ECF Doc. No. 14), and upon review of Judge Hey's detailed findings the
Administrative Law Judge's June 20, 2014 decision is not supported by substantial evidence and
recommending we remand for further proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), it is
Judge Hey's April 28, 2017 Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. No. 13) is
APPROVED and ADOPTED;
Plaintiffs Request for Review (ECF Doc. No. 3) is GRANTED consistent with
Judge Hey's April 28, 3017 Report and Recommendation and the guidance in Illig v.
Commissioner ofSocial Security, 570 Fed.App'x 262, 266 & n.10;
We reverse the Administrative Law Judge's June 20, 2014 decision and remand
consistent with Judge Hey's Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. No. 13); and,
The Clerk of Court shall close this case.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?