LARKIN v. WETZEL et al
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 14) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; LARKIN'S PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. NO. 1) IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 3/13/17. 3/13/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL OVERMYER, et al.
AND NOW, this 13th day of March, 2017, upon careful and independent consideration of
Petitioner Ron Larkin’s pro se Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a
Person in State Custody, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey, to which no objections have been filed, 1 it is ORDERED:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Document 14) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. Larkin’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document 1) is DENIED with prejudice;
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability; and
4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez.
Juan R. Sánchez, J.
The Report and Recommendation was sent to all parties of record on January 23, 2017, together
with a Notice from the Clerk of Court advising the parties of their obligation to file any
objections within 14 days after service of the Notice. See Local R. Civ. P. 72.1 IV(b) (“Any
party may object to a magistrate judge’s proposed findings, recommendations or report under 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) . . . within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof.”).
No objections have been filed to date.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?