GARLAND v. JOSEPH J. PETERS INSTITUTE et al
Filing
37
OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS, ECF NOS. 23-24 ARE GRANTED. PLAINTIFF KENDALL GARLAND'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING IN THE EVENT THAT HIS PROBATION REVOCATION IS INVALIDATED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 3/31/17. 3/31/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED. (ky, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
__________________________________________
KENDALL GARLAND,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
:
JOSEPH J. PETERS INSTITUTE (JJPI);
:
CHAD MARGULIES;
:
AGENT DAGE GARDNER,
:
:
Defendants.
:
__________________________________________
No. 2:16-cv-00527
ORDER
AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants Joseph J.
Peters Institute and Chad Margulies’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 23, and Defendant Agent
Dage Gardner’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 24, and for the reasons set forth in the Opinion
issued this date, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, ECF Nos. 23-24, are GRANTED;
2. Plaintiff Kendall Garland’s Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling in
the event that his probation revocation is invalidated;
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr.__________
JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?