BURRIS v. MAIN LINE HEALTH SYSTEM et al

Filing 42

ORDER: THAT 1. MAIN LINE HEALTH SYSTEM'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 22) AND SAINT CHARLES BORROMEO ROMAN CATHOLIC SEMINARY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 20) ARE DENIED; 2. SAINT CHARLES BORROMEO ROMAN CATHOLIC SEMINARY& #039;S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 31) AND MAIN LINE HEALTH SYSTEM'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 38), WHICH SOUGHT TO SUPPLEMENT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ARE ACCORDINGLY DEEMED MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 6/8/2017. 6/9/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (sme, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WILLIAM BURRIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
MAIN LINE HEALTH SYSTEM et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

No. 16-0543

ORDER
AND NOW, this 8th day of June, 2017, upon consideration of Main Line Health
System’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 22), Saint Charles Borromeo Roman
Catholic Seminary’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 20), Saint Charles Borromeo
Roman Catholic Seminary’s Motion to Supplement Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No.
31), Main Line Health System’s Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 38),
responses thereto, and oral argument, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.

Main Line Health System’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 22) and

Saint Charles Borromeo Roman Catholic Seminary’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No.
20) are DENIED;
2.

Saint Charles Borromeo Roman Catholic Seminary’s Motion to Supplement

Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 31) and Main Line Health System’s Supplemental
Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 38), which sought to supplement Defendants’ Motions
for Summary Judgment are accordingly DEEMED MOOT.
BY THE COURT:

S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
United States District Judge