RAZAK et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al

Filing 125

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. 95) OF THE COURTS PRIOR DENIAL OF THE COURTS PRIOR DENIAL OF PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE COMPLAINT IS THEREFORE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 4/11/18. 4/11/18 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALI RAZAK, KENAN SABANI, and KHALDOUN CHERDOUD CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 16-573 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and GEGAN, LLC ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 2018, upon careful consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 114) and all submissions related thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF 95) of the Court’s prior denial of partial summary judgment is DENIED as moot. The Complaint is therefore DISMISSED with prejudice. BY THE COURT: /s/ Michael M. Baylson _______________________________ MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J. O:\CIVIL 16\16-573 Razak v Uber Technologies\16cv573 Order Granting Summary Judgment.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?