RAZAK et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al

Filing 37

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY THIS ACTION ARE DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 7/21/2016. 7/21/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALI RAZAK, KENAN SABANI, KHALDOUN CHERDOUD CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 16-573 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., GEGAN, LLC ORDER And NOW, this 21ST day of July, 2016, for the reasons stated in the foregoing memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ motion to dismiss and compel arbitration (ECF 15) is DENIED; and 2. Defendants’ motion to stay this action (ECF 18) is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Michael M. Baylson __________________________ Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J. O:\CIVIL 16\16-573 Razak v Uber Technologies\Order Denying MtD and MtS.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?