RAZAK et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 10/7/2016. 10/7/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALI RAZAK, KENAN SABANI,
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
And NOW, this 7th day of October 2016, for the reasons stated in the foregoing
memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the
Pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) (ECF No. 38) is GRANTED in part and
DENIED in part as follows:
1. Defendants’ Motion is DENIED without prejudice as to Count One, Count Three, and
2. Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part without prejudice as to
3. Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED without prejudice as to Count Two;
4. Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED with prejudice as to Count Eight;
Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint as to Count Two and Count Six within 14 days of the
date of this Order.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.
O:\Jessica.2016\16-cv-573 Razak v. Uber\Judgment on the Pleadings Order.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?