RAZAK et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 9/13/2017. 9/13/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALI RAZAK, KENAN SABANI,
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
And NOW, this 13th day of September 2017, for the reasons stated in the foregoing
memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment (ECF 66) is DENIED, without prejudice and with leave to refile at the completion of
discovery. Defendants’ Motion to Strike the new portions of Plaintiffs’ Amended Statement of
Disputed and Undisputed Fact (ECF 83) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
1. Paragraphs 82-103 will be stricken from Plaintiffs’ Amended Statement of Disputed and
Undisputed Fact (ECF 80).
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.
O:\CIVIL 16\16-573 Razak v Uber Technologies\Order Re Partial MSJ.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?