NKANSAH v. AIYEGBUSI et al

Filing 78

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT DOTUN AIYEBUSI'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT BYRON DRAYTON'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT ROBERT LEE WILLIAM'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT ROBERT TOWNS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 10/2/17. 10/3/17 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STEPHEN NKANSAH,
Plaintiff,
v.
DOTUN AIYEGBUSI et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

No. 16-587

ORDER
AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant Dotun
Aiyebusi’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 50), Defendant Byron Drayton’s Motion
for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 51), Defendant Robert Towns’s Motion for Summary
Judgment (Docket No. 52), Defendant Robert Lee Williams’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(Docket No. 53), Plaintiff’s Opposition (Docket Nos. 60-63), Plaintiff’s Omnibus Supplemental
Response (Docket No. 72), and Defendants’ Replies (Docket Nos. 73-76), and following oral
argument on September 22, 2017, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendant Dotun Aiyebusi’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 50) is
GRANTED. The sole remaining claim against Mr. Aiyegbusi is DISMISSED.
2. Defendant Byron Drayton’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 51) is
GRANTED. The sole remaining claim against Mr. Drayton is DISMISSED.
3. Defendant Robert Lee Williams’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 53) is
GRANTED. The sole claim against Mr. Williams is DISMISSED.
4. Defendant Robert Towns’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 52) is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion (Docket No. 52) is

1

DENIED with respect to the breach of contract claim against Mr. Towns. The claims
for fraud and conversion against Mr. Towns are DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
United States District Judge

2