NKANSAH v. AIYEGBUSI et al

Filing 78

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT DOTUN AIYEBUSI'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT BYRON DRAYTON'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT ROBERT LEE WILLIAM'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT ROBERT TOWNS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 10/2/17. 10/3/17 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEPHEN NKANSAH, Plaintiff, v. DOTUN AIYEGBUSI et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 16-587 ORDER AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant Dotun Aiyebusi’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 50), Defendant Byron Drayton’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 51), Defendant Robert Towns’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 52), Defendant Robert Lee Williams’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 53), Plaintiff’s Opposition (Docket Nos. 60-63), Plaintiff’s Omnibus Supplemental Response (Docket No. 72), and Defendants’ Replies (Docket Nos. 73-76), and following oral argument on September 22, 2017, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Dotun Aiyebusi’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 50) is GRANTED. The sole remaining claim against Mr. Aiyegbusi is DISMISSED. 2. Defendant Byron Drayton’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 51) is GRANTED. The sole remaining claim against Mr. Drayton is DISMISSED. 3. Defendant Robert Lee Williams’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 53) is GRANTED. The sole claim against Mr. Williams is DISMISSED. 4. Defendant Robert Towns’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 52) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion (Docket No. 52) is 1 DENIED with respect to the breach of contract claim against Mr. Towns. The claims for fraud and conversion against Mr. Towns are DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: S/Gene E.K. Pratter GENE E.K. PRATTER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?