NICHOLAS v. PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON
ORDER THAT THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; THE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 3/1/17. 3/1/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF., 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN. (pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MR. LORTON WARDEN OF PHILA.
AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2017, upon consideration of plaintiff’s third amended
complaint (ECF No. 16) and his motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 17), it is
The third amended complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a
claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for the reasons stated in the Court’s
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as unnecessary because
plaintiff has already been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this matter.
The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?