NGUYEN v. WILLIAMS et al

Filing 14

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS ARE GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS ARE DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 6/21/2016. 6/21/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SUSAN NGUYEN, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0829 v. R. SETH WILLIAMS et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of June 2016, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 5, 8), Plaintiffs’ Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. No. 6), and the prior Orders of this Court (Doc. Nos. 9, 10), and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 3, 8) are GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3. All outstanding Motions are DENIED AS MOOT. 4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: / s/ J oel H. S l om sk y JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?