DEBERARDINE v. WEINER et al

Filing 14

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 8) IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF (DOC. NO. 12) IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL DOCKET EXHIBIT 1 OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF; PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE STEWART DALZELL ON 7/26/2016. 7/26/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ahf)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHELINE DE BERARDINE, et al. v. JAMIE B. WEINER, et al. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-864 ORDER AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2016, upon consideration of defendants Jamie B. Weiner and Delphi Property Group, LLC’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint (docket entry #8), plaintiffs’ response in opposition thereto, and defendants’ motion for leave to file a reply brief (docket entry #12), and for the reasons set forth in our Memorandum issued this day, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (docket entry #8) is GRANTED; 2. Defendants’ motion for leave to file a reply brief (docket entry #12) is 3. The Clerk of Court shall DOCKET Exhibit 1 of defendants’ motion for GRANTED; leave to file a reply brief; 4. Plaintiffs’ amended complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 5. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case statistically. BY THE COURT: __/s/ Stewart Dalzell, J. Stewart Dalzell, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?